DOGMAN and BLONDIE vs RICKY the RIGHT
Those of us who set out to prove a thing to be good or bad are not reporting evidence. We may however, be the biggest supporters of that which we think we are fighting. WE are not reporting evidence; we are in fact, simply passing along someone else’s propaganda, caling it proof.
If we think something bad is happening, perhaps it is.
If we try to prove ourselves right, we will probably become just another street corner bill peddler or so, passin’ out silly old newsletters.
Do some research; then report.
Personally, I think that BLONDIE is a hopeless psychotic, but that DOGMAN is much more dangerous. I wonder if his Hound from Hell has six testicles on the other end of his three-headed countenance…
(Of course my thoughts don’t count. )
I have also discovered evidence that suggests that DOGMAN has probably been the largest campaign contributor in American History and who has exerted significant influence over the last three presidential campaigns. (Yes, I said “three”.)
Those among us who seek to prove that something bad is happening are helping to make it happen.
Hint: We can always discern PROOF from LOGIC: by asking the question “Which came first, the EVIDENCE or the CONCLUSION.
Stop it please. (We don’t want to shoot the messenger but we may have to unpack the leg irons.)
PROOF WILL NEVER REPLACE THE VALUE OF DISCOVERY.
We already have enough evidence to hang a couple a’ bad guys.(They have their own rope.)
Hint: Suppose BLONDIE never had any intention of making RICKY pay…
ACCEPT THE LOVE AND PASS IT ON.