THE OBJECTIVE POINT OF VIEW
Yes, I know; the OXYMORONIC information contained in the title of this article is obvious. But consider these if you will:
Those who vote rhetorically are not voters but doters.
Those who choose sides are not choosers but losers.
Those who seek solutions lead by default.
Those who seek to lead are at fault.
Those who TAKE steps to discover themselves are eager to share their discoveries.
Those who OBEY steps lose themselves and are eager to enforce their new rules.
Oddly, members of either group would probably agree with these words and defend them.
Rulekeepers say that Pathfinders lack discipline and have a serious ego problem.
Pathfinders say that Rule Keepers are bullies and have a serious ego problem.
Is either group right? Is either group wrong?
Please, keep comments to less than 139 words.
To fix the past or to fox the pissed, one forx the pests of the properly parsed.
One may Accept The Love And Pass It On.
When discussing the assumption of a timeless world (which exists* beyond the material world as defined by the senses) one must choose carefully to avoid the use of words which demonstrate the bias of time; for example, the words used in the sentence before this one.
“Discuss ing”: ing denotes present moment in time.
“Made”: All verbs.
“Use”: All verbs
“Demonstrate”: All verbs.
“Bias”: Implication of time.
My education is primarily in Design and in the Social Sciences. I am interested in Linguistics but only from the perspective of trends in behavior and philosophy.
I suspect that there exists an argument stating that all words and symbols found in all cultures reflect the bias of an awareness of time and that this bias is a necessary feature of extancy (extance)**.
*frustrating, isn’t it? [timeless world (which exists…)]
** Used twice, it is affirmed and therefore considered by at least one person to be a word.
Big deal. Old men and puppy dogs need something to occupy their “time” if only to mark their territory.